You just have to face your fears
I'm looking for something to flatter my figure and maybe a nice cover-up too.
A Weblog For Cool Chicks and Other Barnyard Animals: When in doubt ..... just assume I'm kidding
The Conservative Party now realizes it has no allies in Parliament. And the window of opportunity in bringing down the Liberal government in the fall, or even the spring of 2006, is starting to get smaller.Perhaps now, those who have been clamoring for the Conservatives to flog policy, will understand why Harper has been reluctant to do so. Disdain for Liberal scandal and corruption is the only tie that binds the Conservatives and the Bloc. Harper can't be arsed to explain to those poor dumb Canadians how a Conservative government would, uh, govern because when he does it is going to be increasingly difficult for the Bloc and the NDP to jump under the sheets with him.
Thou shalt not abuse or worry thy cow - thou nor thy man-servant, nor thy maid-servant, nor thy dog, nor the mischievous boy who driveth her up; but thou shalt at all times treat her with gentleness, and allow no one to molest or make her afraid; for in the day that thou vexeth her or suffer her to be vexed there shall come a pestilence upon her, and it shall enter into her milk, and taint thy butter and thy cheese, so that it shall become a stench in the nostrils of the buyer, and he shall turn away from thee with contempt.
This seems to be a very unfortunate trademark of this government, because, as I pointed out in debate in this House last week, this government did exactly the same sort of thing with respect to transportation legislation. The limousine drivers based in Mississauga, under legislation brought in by the Minister of Transportation, are now the only people who have the right to pick up passengers at Pearson airport. If a taxicab driver in the city of Toronto drops someone off, he can no longer pick up anybody at Pearson, but a limousine coming into Toronto can pick up people in Toronto. So why did they do that? Right in the middle of that legislation, the limousine drivers had a fundraiser for the Liberal Party of Ontario and gave them a $200,000 cheque.
So what does this mean? What it means is they are abolishing a secret ballot vote. That's what they're doing by replacing it with card-based certification. What they are doing is opening the door to intimidation. If you are in a workplace where there is an organizing drive underway, you no longer have the privilege of casting a ballot in secret as to whether or not you want to see that workplace organize, a private ballot so that you can express your views, "Is it good for us to have a union or is it a bad thing?" No, you have to sign a card. You have to show your indication of where this should go.Runciman goes on to accuse Dalton McGuinty of pushing the legislation, without full debate, for less than honourable reasons.
But to compound this tragic lack of judgment and this mistake that's going to seriously damage labour relations in the province of Ontario, after Bill 144 was tabled in this House, received second reading and was sent to committee, guess what happened? I'll bet you can't guess, because I don't believe it has ever happened before in the history of this Legislature. The people benefiting from this legislation, the construction labour unions, held a thank you, thank you, thank you fundraiser for Premier Dalton McGuinty and his cabinet ministers.
Mr. McGuinty turned up for this -- we saw the brochure: "Thank you, thank you, thank you, Dalton McGuinty" -- right in the middle of public hearings on legislation that benefits this group. That's the reality. And what did they do? They handed over a $250,000 cheque to the Liberal Party of Ontario. What a thank you. What a great big financial thank you, right in the middle of legislation, when it's at public hearings. How objective can that be? I would question the legality, let alone the morality, of that.
In any sane democratic country, a slap suit against an opinion columnist by a government operative would provoke outrage and non-stop editorials in the mainstream press. The item would be leading the newscasts, with punditry convening soberly on our TV screens. Reporter scrums would pepper government leaders to explain their actions in curtailling that most hallowed (in their eyes) of all freedoms - freedom of the press.Please read the long story.
Funny, I had similar emails from people when I was first with the bombshell that Charest was going to Quebec, ditto with the bombshell about Martinites secretly meeting in Toronto to plot Chretien's ouster. I can think of many other situations (the devolution of the once-mighty John Roth and Nortel, for instance) over the years where I'll be first with something and there are always a few people who are too quick to denounce the messenger.